Sometimes compassion is reckless
Last week when it was raining so heavily there was a knock at my door…
It was a friend of mine (J) and her daughter. It was dark already and very wet… they were looking for shelter fee. They had almost nothing and it was getting late. Could we help?
Crisis time! My boys ran to the door shouting and laughing to see their little friend, as she spun her wet umbrella around with a shriek of joy.
Let me give you a bit of back-story.
We have a standing commitment to them that we pay their shelter fee once a week, every week. They have a hot shower and join us for supper at least once a week, sometimes more. We have included them in the community life that is growing around The Story. We are actively trying to help J find employment.
We have tried to put some structure to our helping J, not because we are trying to keep ourselves safe or free from discomfort. But honestly we have examined our financial ability as a family and have decided that we can make this commitment to J. It is meant to provide her with some security of a once a week solid commitment from us for money. And some dignity of being a part of a community… a family.
But this was not the night we have pledged to help… this is extra… what now?
Honestly we only had enough money to last us maybe until we got paid on Friday. Our resources are finite! We don’t have the money.
“No,” I said, “Sorry we just don’t have the money today.”
And I watched them walk away into the rain and the darkness.
Honestly we just did not have the money. Well, strictly that is not true… we had the money in the house to help our friend today. But that would have meant that we did not have enough for the rest of the week? But what exactly was all that stuff that Jesus said about feeding the birds of the air and clothing the birds of the field! And what about that thing about not worrying about tomorrow? Would God really take care of me tomorrow if I recklessly followed Him today?
As that picture of those two small figures walking away in the dark and the rain played itself over and over in my mind, I asked myself what would Jesus have done?
The next day there was another knock at the door and amidst the rain and the cold there stood my friend again. We invited her in, drank some coffee together, repented for our lack of faith and gave her money for the shelter.
I still don’t have all the answers but sometimes I simply choose to have faith.
You may also enjoy Is following Jesus really that simple?
Book Review: The Irresistible Revolution
I realise this review (in hindsight I am not sure this even qualifies as a review) is about five years after everyone else has probably read the book. But it is one of the occupational hazards of being a incurable non-conformist… if everyone is reading it then I almost always don’t want to.
The book made such an indelible impression on me in a couple of ways that I thought I would scribble down my thoughts anyway.
This is generally an easy read, a bit repetitive at times, a bit circular in theme and logic at times. It reads more like a story but a story with a definite agenda. The theology is at times a bit wonky and at other times down right dodgy. With a few good bits mixed in. Although both Claiborne and I would calls ourselves evangelical I am not sure we would both agree on what that meant. I suspect Claiborne has jigged the term a bit to his own end. Tim Challies has a mostly decent review that looks at some of the theological problems a bit more.
The impact of the book for me is that here is a guy who tangibly puts his life at the service of his theology. Here is a guy that has read his Bible and come to an understanding about what it means to follow Jesus and now he is doing it. Again I do not agree with all of his thinking or actions but you cannot deny that here is a Christian who has put it all on the line to follow Jesus.
My biggest frustration after reading this book is less with Shane Claiborne (although there is quite a bit of that too!) but with those of us who have a better theology, a more robust theology than Claiborne.
Critique his theology all we like (and critique we must!) but let us ask ourselves what is the fruit of our better theology? If Claiborne with his wonky theology can serve the poor, seek justice for the oppressed, move into the forgotten areas of our city and live and love there, practice community at a deep level, welcome the outsider, feed the hungry, question the rampant commercialism of our societies and then follow Jesus in counter-cultural ways that actually display the love, mercy and justice of the Kingdom of God. And there are some great stories of this in the book…
Then surely we who have better theology should be doing the kinds of things Claiborne is doing but just better, deeper and richer. As our theology outstrips his so should our practice…
If we believe what we say we believe… then we ought to know better than him dammit…
Why should I have to read a book filled with wonky theology to be inspired to follow Jesus more radically and counter-culturally.
I am surrounded by those with better theology and yet our track record is terrible in most of the ways Claiborne and his community is brilliant – justice, mercy, community, serving the poor and moving into the forgotten or undesirable areas of our city.
I am the 319 576 092 richest person in the world!
That puts me in the top 5.2% of the world’s population according to the Global Rich List website.
Consider your answer to the following question: how many taps do you have in your house providing clean water -hot and cold? Remember to include the washing machine if you have one and any outside taps for the garden.
If your answer is one or more, then you are among the richest seventh of the world’s population in economic terms.
1.3 Billion people live on less than one US dollar a day. 2.6 billion people lack basic sanitation, while 1.2 billion do not have adequate housing.
Over 20 ooo children die every day of diseases we could prevent.
US Christians spend $8 billion dollars on dieting – that is on curing over-consumption – and only $2 billion on mission.
Yet most of us have become morally numb to these facts. Something is not right. How you handle your money is important for your spiritual well-being. ”No one can serve two masters,” said Jesus. ”Either he will hate the one and love the other or he will be devoted to the one and despise the other. You cannot serve both God and Money, ” (Matthew 6:24)
Every time we spend money, we are making an ethical decision. We are deciding not to spend it on helping the poor or furthering the gospel.
There is a sense in which instead of a thousand dilemmas about how we should use our money, we have to make one fundamental choice: do we live for God or for money? It is because we waver about this decision that we replicate it day by day.
(taken from Porterbrook Training: Gospel Living module; Unit 9: Living Now: Possessions)
Ed Stetzer has a good post on Ways to Engage Global Poverty
Good News to our City: Economic Inequality
On the radio station I used to listen to growing up – Friday was “old skool” day. So I thought I might continue that trend for a while (maybe even sporadically) and on an “old skool” Friday I will re-post an old post of mine that I think might still have some value. So if you have read this before maybe ask yourself – has anything changed? If this is new to you, I would love to hear your thoughts and reactions.
Good News to our City: Economic Inequality
Let us begin with a statement of fact – whites (including Christians) are (present tense intended) the benefactors of the apartheid system. Yes, we all know that “all that discrimination” is in the past and that now we are all even (?!) But to imagine that 40 years of institutionalized (that is even to ignore the fact that racial discrimination was crippling black people long before apartheid was on the statute books) can simply disappear overnight and that previous privileged and disadvantages are no longer valid is simply naive or ungodly.
Let us try an analogy: It is as if we whites and blacks have been playing a game of football and for the first half all the black players have one arm and one leg tied behind their back. Predictably the score at half time is 28-0. At half time the whites realize the error of their ways (best case motives allowed) and untie the blacks for the second half but do nothing about the score. And when the black players, understandably, protest – the white response is anger, whilst pointing out the only now even (?) playing field.
That is Cape Town/South Africa today, we may be 14 years into our new democracy but whites have conveniently forgotten that blacks started this era of democracy 28-0 behind. In order for South Africa to work towards significant economic equality white people have to be prepared to give something up. The question for Christians in Cape Town today is – where does the Kingdom of God fit into all of this?
Martin Luther once said: “If you preach the gospel in all aspects with the exception of the issues which deal specifically with your time you are not preaching the Gospel at all.” (quoted in Ron Sider p52).
If you have any doubt as to whether this is one of the issues of our time here are some statistics:
According to the 2007 statistics on the City of Cape Town website results:
- Unemployment in Cape Town is at 16,9% (2007)
- 58.4% of people aged 20+ have an education level less than grade 12. (2007) whilst a further 23,6% have Grade 12 as their highest education level. Leaving only 16,8% of people aged 20+ with a tertiary qualification.
- 8.4% of people 20+ have less than Grade 5 (2007)
- 38.8% of households are living below the poverty line (2005)
- 6.7% of households have no access to safe drinking water (2007), and 5.8% no access to adequate sanitation (2007) and 2.8% no access to electricity for lighting (2007)
- 108 889 – informal dwellings were serviced by the city in 2007 (this obviously does not include those that were not serviced)
According to the 2004 Study on Informal settlements:
- Amongst those living in informal settlements only 16% have Grade 12 and this drops to as low as 2% among the unemployed.
- 25% of those living in informal settlements are regarded as functionally illiterate.
- 98% of these were Xhosa speaking with 92% having been born in the Eastern Cape.
- 39,5% of adult residents were unemployed (34% men and 66% women)
- 52% of the unemployed had never worked in paid jobs before
- Average household income was R1315 per month (inclusive of state grants received by 41% of households). At the time of the survey the Household Subsistence Level was R1900. More than 80% of households fell below this level.
- 54% of households spoke of times when they had no food for the day. Whilst 61% did not always have enough to eat.
- On average 30 people were sharing one toilet cubicle
- 83% of residents experienced serious problems with flooding around or in their shacks.
According to the Informal Dwelling Count for Cape Town 1993 – 2005 (June 2006),
- The city had a backlog of housing of 260 000.
- The 50 informal settlements in 1993 had grown to over 200 by 2005. Khayalitsha for instance has a total of 13 informal settlements containing 42 170 shacks. And Philippi with a total of 23 informal settlements containing 15114 shacks.
- Since 1993 informal dwellings have grown from 28 300 to 98 031 in 2005.
- Impacting the lives of approximately 400 000 people, almost 13% of the Cape Town population.
According to the City of Cape Town’s Employment Status of Potential Labour Force (those aged 15-64):
- The total unemployment levels in Cape Town are 19,4%
- Of those Black Africans have a 34,8% (225473 people) unemployment rate, comprising 31% of the population
- Coloureds have a 15,8% (147250 people) unemployment rate, comprising 48,13% of the population
- Asians and Indians a 7,1 % (2072 people) unemployment rate comprising 1,43% of the population
- And Whites a 3,1 % (11987 people) unemployment rate comprising 18,75% of the population
Thoughts:
1. In SA this is largely a black-white issue and this is how it is at best perceived and at worst intended. We cannot get away from the reality that white people including Christians are the major beneficiaries of apartheid. If we are serious about racial reconciliation (see part 1 of this series) then we must ask questions about an economic system that entrenches the divide not only between rich and poor, but often also between white and black. If the gospel is to be good news that works to our city then it must be seen to overcoming these divides, uplifting the poor, changing the priorities of the wealthy etc.
2. White Christians (this is a generalization) need to give up their love affair with Western capitalism. Out of the West and particularly the United States comes a form of Christianity which is often too closely wed to capitalism. Capitalism as an economic system is about the maximum profit for the minimum expenses. As Christians in business, running businesses, endorsing and using businesses, this “raw capitalism” is most often at odds with the people-centred, looking after the vulnerable, type economics of the Bible.
We have to practice and endorse and look to encourage whatever form of economic system (in one sense that is irrelevant) best looks after “the poor and the widows”, the vulnerable, those who are without means and resources. Whatever system best allows the greatest number of people to rise above poverty, unemployment, unsanitary living conditions, lack of access to proper healthcare and education is the system/policy/party which we ought to be endorsing.
The sad reality is that most of our decision-making and values are played out not by reading the for instance the Old Testament prophets but by the values which we inherit and endorse as those who are the (continuing) beneficiaries of an unjust economic system. White Christians fail to critique or even see anything wrong with our capitalist economy mainly because we are the beneficiaries and propagators of an unjust system which continues to make the (white) rich richer and the (black) poor poorer
3. White Christians need to consider their living standards and priorities in the light not of first world countries but in light of Africa. In a city where hundreds of our brothers (if we limit it to Christians alone for the point of illustration) regularly go to bed hungry how is it that rich Christians so easily justify the luxury motors, holiday homes, bigger and better homes, gadgets, television screens etc? How is it that rich Christians have wardrobes full of clothes they never wear whilst their brothers and sisters have no shoes or warm top?
How can it be that those who claim to disciples of Jesus and citizens of the Kingdom of God, have the same lifestyle as unbelievers just without the smoking, sex and foul language? How is it that whilst are values are supposedly radically different yet our lifestyles are exactly the same?
4. Reformed theology has traditionally had a defective theology of the Kingdom: we are obsessed with saving souls for heaven,whilst God is busy calling us to join with him in reconciling all things to himself. While we are busy preaching a message which inadvertently has lowered expectations of life now (what is called under-realized eschatology), God is calling us to live now as citizens of his Kingdom of justice, peace, mercy, compassion, and self-denial. We are exclusively concerned with personal holiness while God is calling us to lay down our rights, give away our excess, feed the poor and join with God in demonstrating the in-breaking effects of the new life of the resurrection now.
“For the first Christians, the ultimate ‘salvation’ was all about God’s new world; and the point of what Jesus and the apostles were doing when they were healing people, or being rescued from shipwreck, or whatever, was that this was a proper anticipation of that ultimate ‘salvation’, that healing transformation of space, time and matter. The future rescue which God had planned and promised was starting to come true in the present. We are saved, not as souls, but as wholes.” Tom Wright: Surprised by Hope p211
5. As I alluded to earlier reformed theology has traditionally had a deficient theology of the church. We are all about me and my personal salvation. At best church is a collection of individuals who share common interests and values and who help each other out occasionally. The biblical picture has at the centre of God’s working, not the individual but the people of God, the church. We need a far more communal identity than we often practice. The biblical picture is that of a family, a body, a building, a people belonging to one another, one new humanity.
A more biblical picture of church cannot accept a situation where we buy a new car, or a bigger house, or more shoes whilst our brothers and sisters go to bed hungry or homeless – and we don’t even care enough to pause and consider what we are doing! “Our understanding of the poor, it seems reveals a lot about our understanding of God’s grace.” Tim Chester p29
6. This is not a call to give money to poor people. That may come in time but what white and black, rich and poor need more than anything else in South Africa and Cape Town today is to meet and connect with one another. As Christians we have to stop giving money to appeals or projects (to ease our guilty conscience) and we need to start giving ourselves. Ask yourself this question, where would you find Jesus if he was living in Cape Town today? Among the poor, in the townships, on the gang-ravaged Cape Flats, among the HIV positive crisis? Where do you think he is calling you to be today?
Stop fearing the consequences. Stop worrying about the future. Stop thinking about all the logical reasons why you should maintain your comfortable middle-class white bubble. If you know where Jesus is calling you then why aren’t you following? That is the only question worth answering!
“It is through the death and resurrection of Jesus Christ that we are all invited to devote our lives to the subversive cause of the mustard seed that is destined to redeem a people and transform a world.” Tom Sine: Mustard Seed vs McWorld p27
Recent Comments