I really loved this post by Trevin Wax:
“I guess that’s what I love most about my family. We are more passionate about each other than we are about our ideas. We’re united without being uniform.”
“During the past few weeks, we’ve all been cheering on my sister as she leads a Bible study with three unsaved women. We’ve been praying for my mom’s manicurist for years. Whenever we lead someone to the Lord, we celebrate over email. Dad is in his fifties, but he wants to plant a church to reach unbelievers. Grandpa may not go to movies, but he’s spending his retirement years printing Bibles for other countries. You see, the mission matters more than our family debates.”
“I wish denominations were a little more like family. I wish we’d sit across the table more often from precious saints who don’t always see things the same way. I wish our passion for each other was stronger than our passion for our pet preferences. I wish we’d cut each other some slack instead of nitpicking each other to death. And I wish the fervor of our denominational debates was matched by our fervor for evangelism.”
“We are family. Because of Christ’s death, we share the same bloodline. Because of Christ’s resurrection, we share the same power. Because of His ascension, we share the same mission. So let’s act like it. Let’s live in the unity Christ bought for us and love each other fiercely, even more fiercely than we sometimes disagree.”
Ed Stetzer’s, Lifeway Group just released some new research on church goers and sharing their faith. I would imagine that statistically the results are probably fairly similar in Cape Town.
- 75% of churchgoers say they feel comfortable in their ability to effectively communicate the gospel
- 80% of churchgoers agree they have a personal responsibility to share their faith
- 39% of churchgoers they have shared their faith one or more times over the last six months.
- Nearly half (48%) of church attendees have not invited an unchurched person to attend a church service or some other program at their church in the past six months
BIG QUESTION: Given these statistics does it not raise the question that perhaps we are doing something wrong when it comes to church? If the aim is to make disciples, surely we need to question if our church structures are actually achieving our goal?
What most of us understand as evangelism requires a Christendom mindset. Now I know, before any of you get upset, South Africa (my context) still has a very large Christendom mindset. And while there also exists among many people very strong pre-modern (as opposed to modern or post-modern) tendencies, it would seem that there is still a huge case for evangelism as we know it. And yes, I agree with much of this thinking.
However, I suspect that the shift from pre-modern Christendom to the relativism of Europe and parts of North America, will move at a far more rapid pace than what we have seen over the last two hundred years in the west. After brief stops to take on board privatisation of values from modernism and ethical and spiritual relativism from postmodernism, mix in some misguided understanding of tolerance, some African spirituality and values and leave to rise and set for the next 10-15 years and I suspect we will have a very different picture of urban South Africa. One can already see a strong movement in this direction in the major urban centres. The rural areas I suspect will remain largely untouched and have a similar effect on the cultural landscape as I imagine say the Bible belt does in the United States.
So where does evangelism fit into all this? For most of us evangelism is one thing among the many things that we do as a church. Many churches may even have an evangelism department or pastor.
Evangelism assumes a familiarity with Christianity and church culture. It assumes a similar worldview and these are very often the converts we see through our Christendom models of evangelism. Much evangelism has to do with getting people to come into our church. That may be through events like a special service (gospel service, evangelistic, seeker etc) or through an evangelistic programme designed around a pattern of going out and then coming back (hopefully with others in tow). Evangelism assumes that church is a familiar concept in people’s worlds, this is a Christendom mindset. For the post-Christian world church is as much a part of their life as space travel. We know it’s there and it’s important to some people but it has absolutely no bearing on how I live my life. Nor am I particularly concerned or bothered about it.
Evangelism has an overemphasis on proclamation to the exclusion of the role which the covenant community plays in commending and demonstrating the goodness of the life lived under the reign of King Jesus.
Evangelism, as we know it, is good no doubt, but it is not enough. Increasingly it will involve fishing from an ever-diminishing pool of potential converts. As South Africa becomes more and more culturally distant from Christianity (watch the rhythms and attitudes of the young people – they are the parents of the next generation) evangelism will simply not be enough. We will need to become missional.
So what is the difference? Yes, perhaps we are simply playing games with words (and that quite frankly does bore me) but I think there is some significance in what these words have come to signify.
Missional (and here I am using it in a similar sense to what many might call incarnational) is not a department or programme it is a complete restructuring of every aspect of church life around mission. Rather than a come to us model of evangelism it is a go to them model.
Missional is not a go out and come back to the safety of established church buildings but rather a “go out (together) and stay out among them” and become one of them model. Missional is not about getting them to come to church but rather about us going and being church among them.
Missional is about planting the gospel among a group of people and allowing it to grow among them with no expectation of what shape or form church should take as it grows. Missional is about giving up our preconceived notions of church style and structure and allowing the Spirit to create among us something new.
Missional is not about a Sunday meeting or even a series of meetings – it is about shared lives together that demonstrate that it is good to live under the reign of King Jesus. A community living under the reign of King Jesus will be a profoundly counter-cultural and counter-intuitive community. As we live in this manner proclamation is inevitable
Missional is not a pulpit centred movement but rather the Bible “dwelling among us richly” as we daily gospel “one another” in the context of shared lives.
Missional is re-inventing church from scratch. Not for the sake of novelty or to suit our own desires of how we would like to see church. But rather a community of people whose whole lives are structured around living life together on mission.
Call it church if you will… (I would)